From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. Lamborn

Court of Chancery of Delaware
Aug 12, 2024
C. A. 2022-0842-SEM (Del. Ch. Aug. 12, 2024)

Opinion

C. A. 2022-0842-SEM

08-12-2024

Gwen Thornton v. Louise Lamborn, et al.,


KATHALEEN ST. J. MCCORMICK CHANCELLOR

Dear Counsel:

This letter opinion resolves Defendant Louise Lamborn's exceptions to the Magistrate's final report recommending that the court deny Lamborn's request for attorneys' fees (the "Final Report"). Magistrate Selena E. Molina issued the Final Report on June 17, 2024. Lamborn took exceptions timely, on July 8, 2024. I reassigned this matter to myself for the limited purpose of resolving Lamborn's exceptions. This court applies de novo review to the factual and legal findings of a Magistrate. I have reviewed Lamborn's motion de novo, and I agree with the Magistrate's well-reasoned Final Report.

C. A. No. 2022-0842-SEM Docket ("Dkt.") 54.

Dkt. 53.

Dkt. 54; see Dkt. 53 ¶ 5.

Dkt. 55.

DiGiacobbe v. Sestak, 743 A.2d 180, 184 (Del. 1999).

Delaware courts follow the American Rule that each party is expected to pay its own attorneys' fees regardless of the outcome of the litigation. The court, however, retains the ability to shift fees when faced with vexatious litigation conduct "to deter abusive litigation and to protect the integrity of the judicial process.""Delaware courts have shifted fees for glaringly egregious conduct, such as forcing a plaintiff to file suit to secure a clearly defined and established right, unnecessarily prolonging or delaying litigation, falsifying records, or knowingly asserting frivolous claims." This exception only applies in extraordinary cases.

Chrysler Corp. v. Dann, 223 A.2d 384, 386 (Del. 1966) ("a litigant must, himself, defray the cost of being represented by counsel").

Montgomery Cellular Hldg. Co. v. Dobler, 880 A.2d 206, 227 (Del. 2005) (citation omitted).

Pettry v. Gilead Scis., Inc., 2021 WL 3087027, at *1 (Del. Ch. July 22, 2021) (cleaned up) (compiling cases).

RBC Cap. Mkts., LLC v. Jervis, 129 A.3d 816, 877 (Del. 2015) (cleaned up).

Lamborn claims that the plaintiff knew this court would dismiss this action and filed it only to increase Lamborn's legal fees. But Lamborn's theory lacks strong evidence showing the plaintiff's intent. I therefore decline to shift fees.

The exceptions are overruled. The Magistrate's Final Reports dated January 29, 2024 and June 17, 2024, are adopted and final.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thornton v. Lamborn

Court of Chancery of Delaware
Aug 12, 2024
C. A. 2022-0842-SEM (Del. Ch. Aug. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Thornton v. Lamborn

Case Details

Full title:Gwen Thornton v. Louise Lamborn, et al.,

Court:Court of Chancery of Delaware

Date published: Aug 12, 2024

Citations

C. A. 2022-0842-SEM (Del. Ch. Aug. 12, 2024)