From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorne v. Thorne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1922
203 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Opinion

December 22, 1922.

Frederick L.C. Keating of counsel, for the appellant.

John J. Kirby of counsel, for the respondent.


This action was brought for a divorce. The defendant counterclaimed for divorce against the plaintiff. The action was tried, resulting in a judgment sustaining the defendant's counterclaim. The plaintiff, thereupon, made a motion for a new trial on newly-discovered evidence. Upon that motion a reference was had to a referee to take evidence and report. The reference was made upon condition that the plaintiff give a bond in the sum of $1,000 to pay the costs of the reference. Such bond was given. The referee reported against a new trial, and the report was sustained by the Special Term. The defendant then sued the bondsman upon the bond in the Municipal Court. This motion was made in the divorce action in the Supreme Court to stay the action in the Municipal Court.

One action cannot be stayed by a motion in another action. The motion should have been made in the Municipal Court to stay the proceedings; or, possibly, in another action for injunction against the prosecution of that action a temporary injunction could be granted. But a mere order for a stay of an action cannot be made in another pending action. ( Indestructible Metal Products Co., Inc., v. Summergrade, 197 App. Div. 199.)

The order should be reversed, without costs, and the motion for a stay denied.

CLARKE, P.J., PAGE, GREENBAUM and FINCH, JJ., concur.

Order reversed and motion denied, without costs.


Summaries of

Thorne v. Thorne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1922
203 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for

Thorne v. Thorne

Case Details

Full title:MARY CASEY THORNE, Respondent, v . JOEL WOLFE THORNE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1922

Citations

203 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Citing Cases

Tauszig v. Tauszig

April, 1929. Order staying and enjoining defendant from further prosecuting or proceeding to trial of his…

Safier v. Cohl

There was not a complete identity of parties in the two actions, and a more complete resolution of the…