From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorne v. Casale

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 16, 1925
128 A. 174 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Submitted February 9, 1925 —

Decided March 16, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported sub nomine Thorne v. Kearney, in 100 N.J.L. 228.

For the appellant, John J. Murphy.

For the respondent, John H. Cooper.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, GARDNER, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — KALISCH, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

Thorne v. Casale

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 16, 1925
128 A. 174 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Thorne v. Casale

Case Details

Full title:JOHN THORNE, APPELLANT, v. ANTHONY E. CASALE, RECORDER, ETC., RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Mar 16, 1925

Citations

128 A. 174 (N.J. 1925)
128 A. 174

Citing Cases

O'Gorman Young v. Hartf'd Ins. Co.

105 N.J.L. 645.It is the settled practice in New Jersey that where the subject regulated is properly within…

Hunter v. Mayor & Council of the Township of Teaneck

N.J.S.A. 40:49-5 confers upon magistrates, in their discretion, the power to commit as an aid in the…