From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Woodruff

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 11, 2010
No. 09-09-00247-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-09-00247-CV

Submitted on March 2, 2010.

Opinion Delivered March 11, 2010.

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. E-167,187.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Stacy Thompson and Sean Denzil Thompson filed a notice of appeal but failed to file a brief. On January 21, 2010, we notified the parties that the brief had not been filed and warned the Thompsons that their failure to file a brief could result in a dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. On February 9, 2010, we notified the parties that the appeal would be submitted to the Court without oral argument. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Woodruff

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 11, 2010
No. 09-09-00247-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Thompson v. Woodruff

Case Details

Full title:STACY THOMPSON AND SEAN DENZIL THOMPSON, Appellants v. JAMES J. WOODRUFF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Mar 11, 2010

Citations

No. 09-09-00247-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2010)