From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 15, 1999
725 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

In Thompson v. State, 725 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), rev. gr.,, 735 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 1999), the second district held that 25 points for possession of a semi-automatic firearm is proper even when possession of a firearm is an element of the crime.

Summary of this case from Hall v. State

Opinion

No. 97-04138

Opinion filed January 15, 1999 Rehearing Denied February 12, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Lynn Tepper, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The appellant, James Renorris Thompson, challenges his judgments and sentences for delivery of cocaine, possession of cocaine, aggravated assault, and felonious possession of a firearm. He contends that, pursuant to White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla. 1998), twenty-five points for possession of a semiautomatic firearm were erroneously added to his guidelines score. Though the State concedes error, White merely addresses the inappropriate assessment of eighteen points for possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, where the possession or use of such is already an element of the crime. In State v. Davidson, 666 So.2d 941, 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), however, this court determined that the twenty-five points for use of a semiautomatic firearm could be assessed for the crime of carrying a concealed weapon, because the additional points were intended to distinguish "between types of firearms."Davidson explains that the rule calling for the twenty-five-point assessment — Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(12) — "manifests nothing more than legislative recognition of the need to deter through enhanced punishment the use of semiautomatic firearms and their potential for the infliction of severe injury during the commission of criminal acts." Id., 666 So.2d at 942. We again reach that conclusion. The twenty-five points at issue were therefore properly added to Thompson's guidelines score for his possession of a semiautomatic firearm with respect to his conviction for felonious possession of a firearm.

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., THREADGILL and GREEN, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 15, 1999
725 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

In Thompson v. State, 725 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), rev. gr.,, 735 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 1999), the second district held that 25 points for possession of a semi-automatic firearm is proper even when possession of a firearm is an element of the crime.

Summary of this case from Hall v. State
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES RENORRIS THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 15, 1999

Citations

725 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review the decision in Thompson v. State, 725 So.2d 1217 (Fla.2d DCA 1999), which…

State v. Hall

We have for review the decision in Hall v. State, 738 So.2d 996 (Fla.5th DCA 1999), which was certified to be…