From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: September 27, 2001.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Bell, J.), entered April 11, 2000, which granted the State's motion to dismiss the claim.

Louis Thompson, Stormville, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Julie M. Sheridan of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Claimant's use of ordinary mail to serve the claim on the Attorney-General was unauthorized (see, Court of Claims Act § 11 [a]) and was insufficient to acquire jurisdiction over the State (see, Turley v. State of New York, 279 A.D.2d 819, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 708; Philippe v. State of New York, 248 A.D.2d 827). The Court of Claims, therefore, correctly granted the State's motion to dismiss the claim based upon the affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction asserted in the answer.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 27, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 745

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

Any manner of service other than personal service or certified mail, return receipt requested, is…

Whitehead v. State

Court of Claims Act § 11 (a) (i) requires that the claim be filed with the Clerk of the Court and that "a…