From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 27, 1999
726 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-3782

Opinion filed January 27, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

J. Lewis Hall Jr., Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Nancy L. Showalter, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We have for review on direct appeal the convictions and sentences of Michael Van Thompson (Thompson) for two felony offenses. We affirm the convictions and reverse the sentences.

A jury found Thompson guilty of sexual battery (by using a gun and threatening to use deadly force), and attempted sexual battery, as charged. Thompson committed these crimes in Leon County against the same victim on two different dates: between February 1 and March 1, 1995, and on July 13, 1995. The trial judge sentenced Thompson to prison for sixty years on count one, and ten years on count two, as an habitual offender, to run consecutively.

This court holds that an illegal sentence is fundamental error and thus can be raised for the first time on appeal, despite the failure to raise the issue before the trial judge. Nelson v. State, 719 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Thompson argues that his sentences are illegal because his prior offenses do not qualify for habitual offender sentencing, being more than five years before his instant rape conviction; the State concedes as much. Thompson's habitual felony offender sentences hence must be vacated, and this case is remanded for resentencing. Nelson.

We affirm Thompson's convictions despite a victim outburst at the trial, for the single outburst did not "vitiate the entire trial." Reaves v. State, 639 So.2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1994) (affirming the imposition of the death penalty, despite a number of harmless trial errors).

The trial judge correctly exercised his discretion in denying Thompson's motion for mistrial; we therefore affirm Thompson's convictions. Thompson's habitual felony offender sentences however must be vacated, and we remand for resentencing.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 27, 1999
726 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL VAN THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 27, 1999

Citations

726 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Van Thompson v. State

On direct appeal, the HFO sentences in both cases were vacated for lack of prior qualifying offenses, and the…

Thompson v. State

BARFIELD, C. J. Appellant's conviction is AFFIRMED. For the same reason given in our prior opinion in…