Opinion
NO. 02-12-00552-CR
02-20-2014
ROBERT THOMPSON APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Appellant Robert Thompson appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. A jury convicted him of the offense, and the trial court sentenced him to fourteen years' confinement. Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel's brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v.California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Appellant filed a pro se response to the Anders brief raising three issues; the State did not respond.
386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
After an appellant's court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. Only then may we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922-23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
We have carefully reviewed counsel's brief and the record. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that arguably might support the appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court's judgment.
See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
--------
PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)