From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1899
39 App. Div. 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)

Opinion

April Term, 1899.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Patterson, O'Brien, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ


Judgment affirmed, with costs.


The case was tried before the court without a jury. The trial judge filed a short decision under section 1022 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which directed a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. To that decision the defendant filed no exception, but simply appealed from the judgment. By section 1022 of the Code, in the event of a decision being filed under that section not stating separately the facts found, a general exception is necessary to review a judgment entered upon such decision, in the absence of which there is nothing for this court to review. It follows that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1899
39 App. Div. 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)
Case details for

Thompson v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:Amelia Thompson, Respondent, v. Jacob Schwartz, Appellant, Impleaded with…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1899

Citations

39 App. Div. 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)

Citing Cases

Van Vleck v. Ballou

Where such is the case, the court has no power to review any question which might have been raised upon the…

Goldstein v. Guedalia

We have recently held that where such is the case the court has no power to review either the decision of the…