From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 13, 2023
No. A23A1339 (Ga. Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2023)

Opinion

A23A1339

06-13-2023

GRADY M. THOMPSON, JR. v. JACKY LEE.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

This case began in magistrate court when Grady Thompson, Jr., filed a dispossessory action against Jacky Lee. Lee filed a personal injury counterclaim for damages. The magistrate court dismissed Thompson's claim and entered judgment for Lee for $4,894.82 on his counterclaim. Thompson appealed the judgment to superior court. After the parties entered into a consent agreement on the dispossessory issue, the superior court entered judgment for Lee on his counterclaim in the amount of $3,671.12. Thompson thereafter filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, appeals from superior court decisions reviewing lower court decisions by certiorari or de novo proceedings must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (b); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga.App. 874, 875 (581 S.E.2d 333) (2003). Second, appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less must be brought by discretionary application. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga.App. 357, 357 (509 S.E.2d 655) (1998). "Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional." Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga.App. 257, 257 (471 S.E.2d 60) (1996).

Thompson's failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 13, 2023
No. A23A1339 (Ga. Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Thompson v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:GRADY M. THOMPSON, JR. v. JACKY LEE.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 13, 2023

Citations

No. A23A1339 (Ga. Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2023)