Opinion
Argued April 28, 1891
Decided June 2, 1891
Albert Stickney for appellant.
John J. Adams for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Thompson v. Knickerbocker Ice Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1891
127 N.Y. 671 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Thompson v. Knickerbocker Ice Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1891
127 N.Y. 671 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Thompson v. Knickerbocker Ice Company
Case Details
Full title:PHILIP B. THOMPSON, JR., Respondent, v . THE KNICKERBOCKER ICE COMPANY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 2, 1891
Citations
127 N.Y. 671 (N.Y. 1891)
38 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1016
Citing Cases
Matter of Sewell
also attorneys of high standing, put the value of the services at less, but one of the contestants' own…
Matter of LewiAt page 607, the court said: "All admitted what is well known, that the value of legal services is, to a…