From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Carlsen

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 10, 2010
Civ. No. 9:08-CV-487 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 9:08-CV-487 (TJM/RFT).

March 10, 2010


DECISION ORDER


I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order dated February 16, 2010 have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein.

It is therefore,

ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 24) is GRANTED and the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Thompson v. Carlsen

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 10, 2010
Civ. No. 9:08-CV-487 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Thompson v. Carlsen

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. MR. CARLSEN, Superintendent of Ulster…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 10, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 9:08-CV-487 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2010)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Miller

The Court agrees that because Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claims are without merit, his supervisory…

Franklin v. York

Here, because the Court finds Plaintiff's underlying First Amendment claims are without merit, "none of the…