From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 15, 1980
48 Or. App. 229 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-7871-E, CA 16118

Argued and submitted June 12, 1980

Affirmed September 15, 1980

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

David W. Hittle, Salem, waived argument for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Olson, Hittle, Gardner Evans, Salem.

Paul De Muniz, Salem, argued the cause for respondent — cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson De Muniz, P.C., Salem.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Campbell, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


The attorney's fees issue argued to us in this case was not adequately preserved before the Board. We are in agreement with the Board's factual determination.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 15, 1980
48 Or. App. 229 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Thompson v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of THOMPSON, Petitioner …

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 15, 1980

Citations

48 Or. App. 229 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
615 P.2d 1206