From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 15, 2015
NO. 01-15-00380-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 15, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 01-15-00380-CR

10-15-2015

NITEROI D. THOMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 21st District Court Lee County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 8047

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Niteroi D. Thomas, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk's record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk's record filed due to appellant's fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); Sutherland v. State, 132 S.W.3d 510, 512 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (dismissing criminal appeal for want of prosecution based on appellant's failure to pay for clerk's record). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 15, 2015
NO. 01-15-00380-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:NITEROI D. THOMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Oct 15, 2015

Citations

NO. 01-15-00380-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 15, 2015)

Citing Cases

Keppard v. State

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b)-(c), 43.2(f); see also…