Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, c., Works

Full title: JAMES THOMAS, RESPONDENT, v. LIONDALE BLEACH, DYE AND PRINT WORKS…

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 23, 1933

164 A. 11 (N.J. 1933)

164 A. 11

Opinion

Argued October 26, 1932 —

Decided January 23, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the respondent, John C. Grimshaw.

For the appellant, Kellogg Chance.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 255.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, BROGAN, HEHER, KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.