From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Newport News Division
Nov 5, 2013
ACTION NO. 4:12cv179 (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2013)

Summary

reasoning that the Fourth Circuit has now made it apparent that the ALJ must give the VA's disability determination substantial weight or explain the reason for giving it less weight because "[t]he reasons cited by the Commissioner in [the plaintiff's] case—different rules and different standards—would apply to every case and thus cannot be relied upon to avoid scrutiny of the VA decision under Bird's presumptive standard"

Summary of this case from Comer v. Colvin

Opinion

ACTION NO. 4:12cv179

11-05-2013

NATHANIEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed April 4, 2013, and on the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 6, 2013. The Plaintiff is seeking judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying the Plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act.

On May 13, 2013, the Motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), for a report and recommendation for the disposition of the Motions.

The Report and Recommendation was filed on September 11, 2013. The Magistrate Judge recommended vacating the Commissioner's decision and remanding the case for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. By copy of the Report and Recommendation, the parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. The Defendant's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation were filed on September 24, 2013, and the Plaintiff's Response to the Objections was filed on October 1, 2013.

The court, having examined the Objections and Response to the Objections to the Report and Recommendation and having made de novo findings with respect thereto, does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed September 11, 2013. Accordingly, the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED to the extent that it seeks an order directing an award of Social Security Disability benefits, and is GRANTED to the extent it seeks remand of this case. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Order and the Report and Recommendation.

The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Order to counsel for the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Rebecca Beach Smith

Chief

United States District Judge November 5, 2013


Summaries of

Thomas v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Newport News Division
Nov 5, 2013
ACTION NO. 4:12cv179 (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2013)

reasoning that the Fourth Circuit has now made it apparent that the ALJ must give the VA's disability determination substantial weight or explain the reason for giving it less weight because "[t]he reasons cited by the Commissioner in [the plaintiff's] case—different rules and different standards—would apply to every case and thus cannot be relied upon to avoid scrutiny of the VA decision under Bird's presumptive standard"

Summary of this case from Comer v. Colvin
Case details for

Thomas v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Newport News Division

Date published: Nov 5, 2013

Citations

ACTION NO. 4:12cv179 (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2013)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Colvin

" Persaud v. Colvin, No. 2:12cv661, 2014 WL 198922, at *10 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2014) (unpublished); see also…

Trammell v. Berryhill

See Bird, 699 F.3d. at 343; see also Hildreth, 2015 WL 5577430, at *4 ("An ALJ must 'explicitly detail the…