Thomas v. Cassleberry

Full title: VICTOR KEVEN THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. C.O. J. CASSLEBERRY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Apr 13, 2010

03-CV-6394L (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2010)

Opinion

03-CV-6394L.

April 13, 2010

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID LARIMER, Chief District Judge

Plaintiff, Victor Thomas, moved to amend his complaint, principally to add six new defendants. (Dkt. #56, #61). Defendants' opposed the motions (Dkt. #64).

This Court had referred pretrial matters in this case to United States Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). After considering the relevant papers, Magistrate Judge Payson issued a thorough Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #78), which discussed the facts and the legal principles involved. It was Magistrate Judge Payson's recommendation that the Court should deny the motions. Plaintiff has filed objections to that Report and Recommendation.

After careful review of all the pleadings, as well as Magistrate Judge Payson's Report and Recommendation, I agree with her analysis of the facts and the law. I see no reason to modify, reverse or change the Report and Recommendation and, therefore, I adopt it in its entirety.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff's motions to amend the complaint (Dkt. #56, #61) are in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.