From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Callahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and default judgment vacated in accordance with the following Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, it was an abuse of discretion for Supreme Court to deny the motion of DeJac and Babcock Bar and Grill (defendants) seeking vacatur of the default judgment entered against them. DeJac, the sole proprietor and owner of Babcock Bar and Grill, contacted plaintiff's counsel by letter 13 days following service of the summons and complaint. Although that letter did not constitute an answer, it is clear that it was an attempt to participate in the action pro se (see, Townsend v Torres, 182 A.D.2d 1140; see also, Meyer v AB Am., 160 A.D.2d 688, 689; General Elec. Credit Corp. v Zemrus, 115 A.D.2d 953). DeJac's affidavit and defendants' proposed answer allege a meritorious defense to this personal injury action. Thus, defendants' motion is granted upon condition that plaintiff's counsel retain funds currently held by counsel from execution on the judgment in an interest-bearing escrow account until final judgment is entered in this matter (see, CPLR 5015 [a]) and that defendants serve an answer within 20 days after service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Callahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Thomas v. Callahan

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL THOMAS, Respondent, v. SHAWN CALLAHAN, Defendant, and ELIZABETH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Nat'l v. Slavinski

The record indicates that the appellant contacted the plaintiff's attorneys to request information pertaining…

Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Wik

We further conclude that defendant was entitled to the benefit of the 10 additional days set forth in CPLR…