From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thieme v. Cobb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2016
Case No. 13-cv-03827-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-03827-MEJ Case No. 13-cv-03828-MEJ Case No. 15-cv-02455-MEJ

03-25-2016

STEVE THIEME, Plaintiff, v. DIANE M. COBB, et al., Defendants. CYNTHIA CHENAULT, Plaintiff, v. DIANE M. COBB, et al., Defendants. LEWIS HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. DIANE E. COBB, et al., Defendants.


FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Having reviewed the parties' March 24, 2016 Joint Case Management Statement, it seems prudent to resolve any anticipated motions to amend and/or consolidate prior to considering dispositive motions and setting this matter for trial. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1) Plaintiffs shall file any motion to amend and/or motion to consolidate by May 5, 2016. Plaintiffs are advised that the Court considers five factors in determining whether to grant leave to amend: "(1) bad faith, (2) undue delay, (3) prejudice to the opposing party, (4) futility of amendment; and (5) whether plaintiff has previously amended his complaint." In re W. States Wholesale Nat. Gas Antitrust Litig., 715 F.3d 716, 738 (9th Cir. 2013) (quotation omitted). Plaintiffs must address each factor, bearing in mind that consideration of prejudice to the opposing party carries the greatest weight. Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2003). In structuring their motion, Plaintiffs are encouraged to review the undersigned's recent orders on motions to amend, including Mendia v. Garcia, ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, 2016 WL 758349, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2016); Faulks v. Wells Fargo & Co., 2015 WL 4914986, at *7 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015); Harman v. Ahern, 2015 WL 1885718, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2015); and Tobin v. City & Cty. of San Francisco Police Dep't, 2015 WL 1885632, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2015). Plaintiffs may choose to file the same motion in all three cases or file three separate motions.

2) If Plaintiffs do not file a motion to amend and/or consolidate by May 5, Defendant VanDyk Mortgage Corporation may file a motion for summary judgment by June 2, 2016. The Court will not consider any dispositive motion filed before the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their motion to amend and/or motion to consolidate.

3) As default has been entered against certain Defendants, Plaintiffs are reminded that any motions for default judgment must be structured as in the notice previously provided. Plaintiffs may choose to file the same motion in all three cases or file three separate motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 25, 2016

/s/_________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Thieme v. Cobb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2016
Case No. 13-cv-03827-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Thieme v. Cobb

Case Details

Full title:STEVE THIEME, Plaintiff, v. DIANE M. COBB, et al., Defendants. CYNTHIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2016

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-03827-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2016)