From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thevening v. Jian Young Ye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2002
297 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09866

Submitted September 4, 2002.

September 24, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated September 28, 2001, which denied their motion to compel the plaintiff to submit to a physical examination.

Jaffe Nohavicka, New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants.

Jared Altman, Peekskill, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants forfeited their right to conduct physical examinations of the injured plaintiff when they failed to arrange and conduct the examinations within the time period required by the Supreme Court's pretrial conference orders (see Vitello v. JAM Installers, 264 A.D.2d 774; Gill v. United Parcel Serv., 249 A.D.2d 265; Levine v. McFarland, 98 A.D.2d 795). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying their motion to compel such discovery.

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thevening v. Jian Young Ye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2002
297 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Thevening v. Jian Young Ye

Case Details

Full title:ERNESTO THEVENING, respondent, v. JIAN YOUNG YE, ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 24, 2002

Citations

297 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
747 N.Y.S.2d 793

Citing Cases

Irizarry v. City of Rye

The Court finds that defendant's failure to complete plaintiffs physical examination by the court's deadlines…

Friedman v. MTA Long Island R.R.

, stating that where a defendant has failed to move to vacate the note of issue and under certain…