From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Theurer v. Dep't of Def.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2013
NO. 7:13-CV-142-FL (E.D.N.C. Sep. 20, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 7:13-CV-142-FL

2013-09-20

SENIOR AIRMAN MATTHEW A. THEURER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter comes before the court upon Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of United States Magistrate Judge William A. Webb (DE 15), regarding petitioner's motion for order (DE 3), and respondent's motion to dismiss (DE 7). No objections to the M&R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. Also before the court is remaining part of respondent's motion to shorten time periods, as it relates to any response by the creditor to its subpoena (DE 16). Said motion in this part was held in abeyance by order on September 12, 2013, awaiting the ripening of M&R, now ready for address.

BACKGROUND

For a more detailed iteration of the background in this case, the court references its September 12, 2013, order. M&R recently issued, wherein it is recommended that petitioner's motion be denied, and respondent's motion be allowed. Notice also was provided September 6, 2013, to petitioner of the objection processes adhered to in the regular course, according to the rules, where a party is accorded fourteen (14) days within which to file and serve objections, to which the other party may respond, also within fourteen (14) days. On September 11, 2013, respondent made motion to shorten this time period, which was granted in part. Petitioner and Crossroad Financial Credit Union were served copies of the court's September 12, 2013, order, and no response or objection was made to M&R or to the remaining motion to shorten response time.

COURT'S DISCUSSION

The government's motion to shorten time is unresolved in part where respondent seeks to shorten the time the subject creditor has to respond to the subpoena at issue should the government's motion to dismiss ultimately be granted. The government again points to upcoming trial commencing October 14, 2013, and notes that if its motion to dismiss is granted, the creditor ordinarily would have thirty (30) days within which to respond to the subpoena. The government requests that the time be decreased, where it reiterates need to have time to receive and review the records and to provide them to defense counsel in ample time to prepare for trial.

Upon careful review of the M&R and of the record generally, having found no clear error, the court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own (DE 15), and, for the reasons stated therein, petitioner's motion is DENIED (DE 3), and respondent's motion is GRANTED (DE 7). Respondent's motion to shorten time is also GRANTED as to the subpoena response time (DE 16). Crossroads Financial Credit Union shall have until October 9, 2013, to respond to the subpoena. This action is DISMISSED.

___________

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Theurer v. Dep't of Def.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 20, 2013
NO. 7:13-CV-142-FL (E.D.N.C. Sep. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Theurer v. Dep't of Def.

Case Details

Full title:SENIOR AIRMAN MATTHEW A. THEURER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2013

Citations

NO. 7:13-CV-142-FL (E.D.N.C. Sep. 20, 2013)

Citing Cases

Love v. Dep't of Def.

, the motion should be denied. See Theurer v. Dep't of Def., No. 7:13-CV-142-FL, 2013 WL 5327471, at *3…

Allison v. U.S. Dep't of Justice Privacy Act of 1978

There are only three reasons a district court may grant a motion to quash: "1) the agency's inquiry is not a…