From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ThermoLife Int'l, LLC v. Better Body Sports, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2013
Master Case: CV12-09229 GAF (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Master Case: CV12-09229 GAF (FFMx)

2013-10-15

THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BETTER BODY SPORTS, LLC, et al., Defendants, And Related Counterclaims and Consolidated Actions.


(related/coordinated to ALL CASES)


Judge: The Honorable Gary A. Feess


JUDGMENT

On October 26, 2012, Plaintiff, Thermolife International, LLC ("Thermolife") filed its Complaint against Defendants All Star Health; Lecheek, LLC; Lone Star Distribution; Maximum Human Performance, LLP; Purus Labs, Inc.; Reaction Nutrition, LLC; Redefine Nutrition LLC; Bronson Laboratories, Inc.; Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition, Inc.; Pharmafreak Holdings, Inc.; Nutrex Research, Inc.; Infinite Labs LLC; Muscle Warfare, Inc.; Allmax Nutrition, Inc.; General Nutrition Corporation; General Nutrition Centers, Inc.; GNC Corporation; Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; DNA Sports Nutrition; Nutrition Zone Worldwide, Inc.; SNI, LLC; and NutraPlanet, alleging that Defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,202,908 ("the '908 patent") entitled "D-Aspartic Acid Supplement." Defendants filed their separate Answers to Plaintiff's Complaint, which included Counterclaims for (1) Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement; (2) Declaratory Judgment of Patent Invalidity; and (3) Inequitable Conduct.

On July 15, 2013, Defendants, All Star Health; Lecheek, LLC; Lone Star Distribution; Maximum Human Performance, LLP; Purus Labs, Inc.; Reaction Nutrition, LLC; Redefine Nutrition LLC; Bronson Laboratories, Inc.; Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition, Inc.; Pharmafreak Holdings, Inc.; Nutrex Research, Inc.; Infinite Labs LLC; Muscle Warfare, Inc.; General Nutrition Corporation; General Nutrition Centers, Inc.; GNC Corporation; Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; DNA Sports Nutrition; Nutrition Zone Worldwide, Inc.; SNI, LLC; and NutraPlanet (collectively, "Defendants"), filed their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 8,202,908 and For Attorneys' Fees.

On October 8, 2013, the Court granted Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and held that the '908 Patent is invalid. The Court denied Defendants' Request for Attorneys' Fees.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, based on the record in this civil action, as follows:

1. The '908 Patent is invalid;

2. Defendants' Request for Attorneys' Fees is denied;

3. Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants;

4. Costs shall be awarded pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1); and

5. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in accordance with the foregoing.

SO ORDERED.

_____________

The Honorable Gary A. Feess

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

ThermoLife Int'l, LLC v. Better Body Sports, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2013
Master Case: CV12-09229 GAF (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2013)
Case details for

ThermoLife Int'l, LLC v. Better Body Sports, LLC

Case Details

Full title:THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BETTER BODY SPORTS, LLC, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 15, 2013

Citations

Master Case: CV12-09229 GAF (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2013)