Thermolife International, LLC v. Better Body Sports, LLC

Full title: THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BETTER BODY SPORTS, LLC, et…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2013

Master Case CV12-09229 GAF (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2013)

Opinion

THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BETTER BODY SPORTS, LLC, et al., And Related Counterclaims and Consolidated Actions. Defendants. Master Case No. CV12-09229 GAF (FFMx). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 15, 2013.

          JUDGMENT

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         On October 26, 2012, Plaintiff, Thermolife International, LLC ("Thermolife") filed its Complaint against Defendants All Star Health; Lecheek, LLC; Lone Star Distribution; Maximum Human Performance, LLP; Purus Labs, Inc.; Reaction Nutrition, LLC; Redefine Nutrition LLC; Bronson Laboratories, Inc.; Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition, Inc.; Pharmafreak Holdings, Inc.; Nutrex Research, Inc.; Infinite Labs LLC; Muscle Warfare, Inc.; Allmax Nutrition, Inc.; General Nutrition Corporation; General Nutrition Centers, Inc.; GNC Corporation; Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; DNA Sports Nutrition; Nutrition Zone Worldwide, Inc.; SNI, LLC; and NutraPlanet, alleging that Defendants Supplement." Defendants filed their separate Answers to Plaintiff's Complaint, which included Counterclaims for (1) Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement; (2) Declaratory Judgment of Patent Invalidity; and (3) Inequitable Conduct.

         On July 15, 2013, Defendants, All Star Health; Lecheek, LLC; Lone Star Distribution; Maximum Human Performance, LLP; Purus Labs, Inc.; Reaction Nutrition, LLC; Redefine Nutrition LLC; Bronson Laboratories, Inc.; Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition, Inc.; Pharmafreak Holdings, Inc.; Nutrex Research, Inc.; Infinite Labs LLC; Muscle Warfare, Inc.; General Nutrition Corporation; General Nutrition Centers, Inc.; GNC Corporation; Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; DNA Sports Nutrition; Nutrition Zone Worldwide, Inc.; SNI, LLC; and NutraPlanet (collectively, "Defendants"), filed their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 8, 202, 908 and For Attorneys' Fees.

         On October 8, 2013, the Court granted Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and held that the '908 Patent is invalid. The Court denied Defendants' Request for Attorneys' Fees.

         It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, based on the record in this civil action, as follows:

         1. The '908 Patent is invalid;

         2. Defendants' Request for Attorneys' Fees is denied;

         3. Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants;

         4. Costs shall be awarded pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1); and

         5. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in accordance with the foregoing.

         SO ORDERED.