Opinion
No. 32398
Decided December 6, 1950.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Subornation of perjury in divorce case — Conviction and sentence — Admissibility and sufficiency of evidence — Argument to jury — Limiting defendant's counsel to one and one-half hours — Trial judge accompanied jury to dinner during deliberations — Charge to jury — Right to defend with counsel — Fair, public trial by impartial jury — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Article VI, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin county.
Mr. Ralph J. Bartlett, prosecuting attorney, Mr. George T. Tarbutton and Mr. Edmund B. Paxton, for appellee.
Mr. Paul M. Herbert and Mr. Joseph L. Meenan, for appellant.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and TAFT, JJ., concur.
FAUGHT, J., not participating.