From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Florida Bar v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 26, 1984
453 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1984)

Summary

suspending attorney for sixty days for failing to notify business partner of sale of some property while acting as trustee for a group of investors and failing to make a timely accounting of funds received from sale

Summary of this case from Florida Bar v. Schultz

Opinion

No. 63815.

July 26, 1984.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee and David G. McGunegle, Bar Counsel, Orlando, for complainant.

Devitt J. Adams, in pro. per., Fort Pierce, for respondent.


This disciplinary proceeding is before us upon the complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of a referee. Neither The Florida Bar nor the respondent have petitioned for review of the report. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.; Fla.Bar Integr.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.09.

The referee found that respondent engaged in unethical conduct by failing to notify a business partner of the sale of some property by respondent as trustee for a group of investors and failing to make a timely accounting of funds received from the sale. The referee recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for sixty days with automatic reinstatement and that he pay for the costs of these proceedings. It is uncontested that an attorney can be disciplined for failing to completely disclose essential matters in business transactions with nonclients. E.g., The Florida Bar v. Davis, 373 So.2d 683 (Fla. 1979); The Florida Bar v. Bennett, 276 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1973). We approve the referee's findings of fact. Because neither party has sought review of the recommended discipline, we adopt it. See Fla.Bar Integr.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.09(3)(f). Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of sixty days. He is allowed thirty days for the orderly closing of his practice. Respondent shall also pay to The Florida Bar $1,299.39, the costs of these proceedings.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The Florida Bar v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 26, 1984
453 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1984)

suspending attorney for sixty days for failing to notify business partner of sale of some property while acting as trustee for a group of investors and failing to make a timely accounting of funds received from sale

Summary of this case from Florida Bar v. Schultz

ordering suspension when lawyer failed to notify a business partner of the sale of property by lawyer as trustee for a group of investors and failing to make a timely accounting of funds received from the sale

Summary of this case from Florida Bar v. Wasserman

In Adams, respondent engaged in unethical conduct by failing to notify a business partner of the sale of some property by respondent as trustee for a group of investors and failing to make a timely accounting of funds received from the sale.

Summary of this case from The Florida Bar v. Jennings
Case details for

The Florida Bar v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT, v. DEVITT J. ADAMS, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 26, 1984

Citations

453 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1984)

Citing Cases

The Florida Bar v. Jennings

The recommended discipline, in my opinion, is nothing more than a mild, gentle, slap on the wrist, and I am…

Florida Bar v. Wasserman

In addition, this Court has ordered a sixty-day suspension for a lawyer who failed to disclose essential…