From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thavisack v. Walker

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 4, 2015
2:15-cv-1371 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2015)

Opinion


BONNEY THAVISACK, Petitioner, v. J. WALKER, Warden, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-1371 DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 4, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         By an order filed July 20, 2015, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result dismissal of this action without prejudice. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this action is dismissed without prejudice.

Petitioner has previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Doc. No. 4)


Summaries of

Thavisack v. Walker

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 4, 2015
2:15-cv-1371 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Thavisack v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:BONNEY THAVISACK, Petitioner, v. J. WALKER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 4, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-1371 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2015)