From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thalassinos v. Brutsche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1962
17 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

October 9, 1962


In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property, defendant Brutsche appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 1, 1961, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him for lack of prosecution (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 156). Such denial was conditioned upon the service and filing by plaintiff of a note of issue for a subsequent term of the court. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing of merit. The moving affidavit by counsel for said defendant Brutsche made no claim of prejudice by reason of the delay. Moreover, it appears the motion to dismiss was not made until after the running of the Statute of Limitations. Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thalassinos v. Brutsche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1962
17 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Thalassinos v. Brutsche

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW THALASSINOS, Respondent, v. WALTER BRUTSCHE, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1962

Citations

17 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Meyer v. Teresi

This is particularly the case where there is no showing that defendants have been prejudiced by delay and…