From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texido v. the Waters of Orchard Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 02-01871

December 5, 2002.

Motion to vacate dismissal granted on condition that appeal perfected on or before January 3, 2003.

PRESENT: HAYES, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND LAWTON, JJ.


Memorandum:

In the absence of any indication that defendants were misled or prejudiced, the notice of appeal is deemed amended to correct the name of appellant ( see Waters of White Lake, Inc. v. Fricke, 276 A.D. 628, 628-629).


Summaries of

Texido v. the Waters of Orchard Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Texido v. the Waters of Orchard Park

Case Details

Full title:MONICA L. TEXIDO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 1150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
755 N.Y.S.2d 348

Citing Cases

Woloszuk v. Logan-Young

Wende Logan–Young, M.D., doing business as Elizabeth Wende Breast Clinic (Clinic), Wende Logan–Young, M.D.,…

Peterson v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Initially, we note that, in each appeal, "[i]n the absence of any indication that defendant [was] misled or…