From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texas Theatres v. Pittman

U.S.
Nov 7, 1938
305 U.S. 3 (1938)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

No. 26.

Submitted October 19, 1938. Decided November 7, 1938.

CERTIORARI, 304 U.S. 556, to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals, 93 F.2d 21; 94 id. 203, affirming a judgment for damages against petitioner, dismissed, with costs, in view of subsequent settlement in the District Court c.

Mr. W.B. Handley submitted for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.


Respondent recovered judgment for damages in an action for injuries suffered by his wife. After appeal had been argued and while it was under advisement in the Circuit Court of Appeals, the parties entered into a stipulation for settlement on payment of a sum less than the judgment and providing that the judgment should be reversed and judgment entered in the District Court for costs only. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. 93 F.2d 21. Alleging that the court had been informed of the compromise and stipulation, petitioner sought a rehearing, which was denied. 94 F.2d 203. We granted certiorari.

Upon the case being called for argument in this Court, respondent did not appear. Petitioner submitted a statement showing that, since the issue of the writ, an order upon hearing had been entered in the District Court whereby the judgment involved was decreed to be satisfied and discharged in full and the issue of execution thereon was prohibited; that respondent excepted to the order and gave notice of appeal but that the appeal had not been prosecuted.

Petitioner submitted the case for such order as the Court may deem proper and suggested that the costs of this proceeding may be taxed against it.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed with costs against petitioner.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Texas Theatres v. Pittman

U.S.
Nov 7, 1938
305 U.S. 3 (1938)
Case details for

Texas Theatres v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:TEXAS CONSOLIDATED THEATRES, INC. v . PITTMAN

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 7, 1938

Citations

305 U.S. 3 (1938)

Citing Cases

Mole v. City of Durham

This raises questions of fundamental fairness. Traditionally, DRIA's limited use as a disposition has been…

LaSell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.

); Fox Tucson Theatres Corp. v. Lindsay, 47 Ariz. 388, 56 P.2d 183, 185 (plaintiff, in going from a dimly…