From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texas N.O.R. Co. v. United States

U.S.
May 13, 1935
295 U.S. 395 (1935)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

No. 670.

Argued May 1, 1935. Decided May 13, 1935.

Rate-fixing orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission sustained. 10 F. Supp. 198, affirmed.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of three judges dismissing the bill in a suit to set aside two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Mr. Robert Wilkins Thompson, with whom Messrs. Jules Henri Tallichet and T.D. Gresham were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Nelson Thomas, with whom Solictor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Stephens, and Messrs. Elmer B. Collins and Daniel W. Knowlton were on the brief, for the United States et al.


This is a suit to restrain the enforcement of two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, made July 24, 1933, and December 11, 1933, respectively, relating to rates for the transportation of horses and mules, in carloads, in southwestern territory. 195 I.C.C. 417. Upon the hearing by the District Court, composed of three judges, the application for an injunction was denied and the amended bill of complaint was dismissed.

This Court, upon an examination of the record, agrees with the conclusion of the District Court that the orders in question were sustained by findings of the Commission acting within its statutory authority and that these findings were adequately supported by evidence. The decree is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Texas N.O.R. Co. v. United States

U.S.
May 13, 1935
295 U.S. 395 (1935)
Case details for

Texas N.O.R. Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TEXAS NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v . UNITED STATES ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 13, 1935

Citations

295 U.S. 395 (1935)

Citing Cases

Edwin Cigar Co. v. Higgins

The clarity with which the court has spoken is best illustrated by quoting from 285 U.S. 22, at page 47, 52…

C. O. Ry. Co. v. United States

The decree denying injunction and dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed. Texas New Orleans R. Co. v.…