From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texaco, Inc. v. Appleget

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 11, 1973
307 A.2d 603 (N.J. 1973)

Opinion

Argued June 4, 1973 —

Decided July 11, 1973.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. E. Robert Levy, argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Marcus, Rosen, Breslow, Levy Fischer, attorneys).

Mr. George H. Bohlinger, Jr., argued the cause for respondent.


We have this day decided Shell Oil Company v. Marinello, 63 N.J. 402 in which we held that the public policy of this State restricts the unilateral right of an oil company to terminate, cancel or fail to renew a lease and dealer agreement with one of its service station operators to a situation where "good cause" for such action exists.

This requires that the judgment of the Appellate Division herein, affirming a judgment for possession entered by the District Court in a summary action for the recovery of premises, be vacated and the matter remanded and transferred to the Law Division for a plenary hearing on the pertinent issues. See N.J.S.A. 2A:18-60 and 61. For vacation and remand — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN and GARVEN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Texaco, Inc. v. Appleget

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 11, 1973
307 A.2d 603 (N.J. 1973)
Case details for

Texaco, Inc. v. Appleget

Case Details

Full title:TEXACO, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 11, 1973

Citations

307 A.2d 603 (N.J. 1973)
307 A.2d 603

Citing Cases

Mariniello v. Shell Oil Company

s Act works an unconstitutional impairment of contract between a franchisor and his franchisee. Consumers Oil…

Rossnagle v. Capra and Shell Oil Co.

It is uncontradicted from the record in this case that, at all times pertinent to the litigation before us,…