From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
CASE NO. 4:12-cv-00692-CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:12-cv-00692-CW

03-22-2013

TESSERA, INC., Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC et al. Defendants and Counterclaimants.

Gregory P. Stone (SBN 078329) gregory.stone.mto.com Ted G. Dane (SBN 143195) ted.dane@mto.com Katherine K. Huang (SBN 219798) katherine.huang@mto.com Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP Fred H. Bartlit, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) fred.bartlit@bartlit-beck.com Eric R. Olson (Pro Hac Vice) eric.olson@bartlit-beck.com Sean Grimsley (SBN 216741) sean.grimsley@bartlit-beck.com Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc. Michael J. Bettinger (SBN 122196) mike.bettinger@klgates.com Timothy P. Walker (SBN 105001) timothy.walker@klgates.com Stephen M. Everett (SBN 121619) stephen.everett@klgates.com Elaine Y. Chow (SBN 194063) elaine.chow@klgates.com K&L Gates Four Embarcadero Center, Ste. 1200 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ATI Technologies ULC


Gregory P. Stone (SBN 078329) gregory.stone.mto.com
Ted G. Dane (SBN 143195) ted.dane@mto.com
Katherine K. Huang (SBN 219798) katherine.huang@mto.com
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
Fred H. Bartlit, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) fred.bartlit@bartlit-beck.com
Eric R. Olson (Pro Hac Vice) eric.olson@bartlit-beck.com
Sean Grimsley (SBN 216741) sean.grimsley@bartlit-beck.com
Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc. Michael J. Bettinger (SBN 122196) mike.bettinger@klgates.com
Timothy P. Walker (SBN 105001) timothy.walker@klgates.com
Stephen M. Everett (SBN 121619) stephen.everett@klgates.com
Elaine Y. Chow (SBN 194063) elaine.chow@klgates.com
K&L Gates
Four Embarcadero Center, Ste. 1200
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ATI Technologies ULC

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF

FINAL DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc. ("Tessera") and Defendant and Counterclaimant ATI Technologies ULC, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c), that all claims and counterclaims as between them in the above-captioned matter be, and upon approval are, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By: _______________

Ted G. Dane

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

Tessera, Inc.

K&L GATES LLP

By: Elaine Y. Chow

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ATI

Technologies ULC
SO ORDERED.

_______________

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for ATI Technologies ULC, Elaine Chow.

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By: _______________

Ted G. Dane

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

Tessera, Inc.


Summaries of

Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
CASE NO. 4:12-cv-00692-CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TESSERA, INC., Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., ATI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 4:12-cv-00692-CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)