From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teschke v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1969
32 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

July 1, 1969


Appeal by the State from a judgment of the Court of Claims entered March 7, 1968 awarding damages to the claimants. The finding of the trial court that the water in the area of the restroom where claimant Marion Teschke fell was the result of being tracked in by patrons following a "downpour of rain" which occurred just prior to the accident mandates the conclusion that the State had not failed to exercise reasonable care. (See Pascual v. State of New York, 23 A.D.2d 518; Kelly v. State of New York, 29 A.D.2d 904.) In the absence of notice, either actual or constructive, claimants must prove that the State created the hazardous condition and this the claimant failed to show. (See Conroy v. Saratoga Springs Auth., 259 App. Div. 365, 367, affd. 284 N.Y. 723; Antenen v. New York Tel. Co., 271 N.Y. 558; Miller v. Gimbel Bros., 262 N.Y. 107.) Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and claim dismissed without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.


Summaries of

Teschke v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1969
32 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Teschke v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARION TESCHKE et al., Respondents, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
301 N.Y.S.2d 829

Citing Cases

Van Stry v. State

se of the bath" (or pool) ( Conroy v Saratoga Springs Auth., supra, p. 367; Sciarello v Coast Holding Co.,…

Crawford v. City University

(See, Matter of Santana v New York State Thruway Auth., 92 Misc.2d 1.) Who will be successful on the trial is…