From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Terzian v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 10, 1924
200 N.W. 943 (Mich. 1924)

Opinion

Docket No. 118.

Submitted October 21, 1924.

Decided December 10, 1924.

Error to Wayne; Cross (Orien S.), J., presiding. Submitted October 21, 1924. (Docket No. 118.) Decided December 10, 1924.

Assumpsit by Khatchig Terzian against Morris Gordon and another on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. From an order granting a motion for a new trial, plaintiff brings error. Writ dismissed.

Sherman D. Callender ( J.H.M. Alexander, of counsel), for appellant.

Payne Payne ( Thomas W. Payne, of counsel), for appellees.


By writ of error we are asked to set aside an unconditional order of the circuit court granting defendants a new trial and direct the circuit court to enter judgment for the amount plaintiff claimed, or, at least, for the amount found in his favor by the jury. It cannot be done. The Mifflinburg Bank v. Bickhart, 224 Mich. 98.

Writ dismissed on our own motion. No costs.

CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, BIRD, SHARPE, MOORE, STEERE, and FELLOWS, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Terzian v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 10, 1924
200 N.W. 943 (Mich. 1924)
Case details for

Terzian v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:TERZIAN v. GORDON

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 10, 1924

Citations

200 N.W. 943 (Mich. 1924)
200 N.W. 943

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

It is the rule of this court that an unconditional order granting a new trial may not be reviewed on writ of…

Benmark v. Steffen

"It is the rule of this Court that an unconditional order granting a new trial may not be reviewed on writ of…