From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Terry v. Walker

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division
Mar 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 3:04CV00064 (W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2006)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding fraudulent transfer action does not present federal interest sufficiently compelling to justify federal choice of law rules

Summary of this case from Pereira v. Urthbox, Inc. (In re Try World, Inc.)
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:04CV00064.

March 23, 2006

ORDER

NORMAN MOON, District Judge

Before the Court is the Receiver's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Choice of Law for Fraudulent Conveyances, filed on January 13, 2006. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Receiver's Motion shall be, and it hereby is, GRANTED. Accordingly, the Receiver's claim of fraudulent conveyance in this case shall be governed by the law of the state of Michigan.

The Clerk of the Court hereby is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

Summaries of

Terry v. Walker

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division
Mar 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 3:04CV00064 (W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2006)

holding fraudulent transfer action does not present federal interest sufficiently compelling to justify federal choice of law rules

Summary of this case from Pereira v. Urthbox, Inc. (In re Try World, Inc.)

holding fraudulent transfer action does not present federal interest sufficiently compelling to justify federal choice of law rules

Summary of this case from O'Connor v. DL-DW Holdings (In re Extended Stay, Inc.)

finding that because of §§ 77v and 78aa, the court had "a special brand of pendant jurisdiction" over the Receiver's claims — which were "exclusively based in state law" — including a claim to recover fraudulent conveyances received from a Ponzi scheme

Summary of this case from WARFIELD v. ARPE

stating that some courts characterize fraudulent conveyance actions as tort actions, while others characterize them as matters in equity

Summary of this case from Friedman v. Wellspring Capital Mgmt.
Case details for

Terry v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:ROY M. TERRY, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS R. WALKER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division

Date published: Mar 23, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:04CV00064 (W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2006)

Citing Cases

WARFIELD v. ARPE

Accordingly, several district courts have found subject matter jurisdiction to exist in suits like this one,…

Pereira v. Urthbox, Inc. (In re Try World, Inc.)

See Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Enron Corp. v. Whalen (In re Enron Corp.), 351 B.R. 32, 50 n.22…

4 Citing Cases