From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tenore v. Long

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 19, 2024
2:23-cv-01960-RSL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 19, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01960-RSL

07-19-2024

JOHN TENORE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID J. LONG; CRAIG E. KINZER; and KELLY E. LONG, Defendants.

Andrew Grimm Digital Justice Foundation Attorney for Plaintiff John Tenore William C. Rava Jacob P. Dini Perkins Coie LLP Attorneys for Defendants David J. Long. Kelly E. Long and Craig E. Kinzer


Andrew Grimm Digital Justice Foundation Attorney for Plaintiff John Tenore

William C. Rava Jacob P. Dini Perkins Coie LLP Attorneys for Defendants David J. Long. Kelly E. Long and Craig E. Kinzer

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(II)

Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the parties that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees.

Stipulated to on this 18th day of July, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tenore v. Long

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 19, 2024
2:23-cv-01960-RSL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Tenore v. Long

Case Details

Full title:JOHN TENORE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID J. LONG; CRAIG E. KINZER; and KELLY E…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 19, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-01960-RSL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 19, 2024)