From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Bean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 6, 1954
283 App. Div. 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

January 6, 1954.

Appeal from Seneca County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.


Final order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Appellants have limited their appeal to the sole question of whether the report of the commissioners is sufficient upon its face. The report sets forth the rule of damages adopted by the commissioners and the report is clear, explicit and certain. Accordingly, the report is sufficient upon its face. The state of the record before condemnation commissioners in some proceedings may necessitate a more detailed report than that submitted in this proceeding. Inasmuch as appellants have limited their appeal to the question of the sufficiency of the report, from an examination of the report on its face, and appellants not having sought a review on the merits, no such question arises in this case. All concur.


Summaries of

Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Bean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 6, 1954
283 App. Div. 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Bean

Case Details

Full title:TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, Respondent, v. WALTER F. BEAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 6, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agcy. v. Burnside

In affirming the order we note that there is no such requirement imposed on the Commissioners. The report of…

Board of Suprs., Monroe v. Matthews

"While it is true that the commissioners are given wide latitude and discretion in arriving at their decision…