In Tennant v. Smith, 173 Iowa 264, 155 N.W. 267, the plaintiffs, as heirs-at-law of decedent, brought action for construction of his will, naming as defendants his administrator and the heirs of a predeceased devisee who claimed under the wills because of the antilapse statute.
Summary of this case from Beem v. BeemMay, 1913.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
In Tennant v. Smith, 173 Iowa 264, 155 N.W. 267, the plaintiffs, as heirs-at-law of decedent, brought action for construction of his will, naming as defendants his administrator and the heirs of a predeceased devisee who claimed under the wills because of the antilapse statute.
Summary of this case from Beem v. BeemFull title:Wesley F. Tennant, Respondent, v. John Smith, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1913
On the other hand, the appellees contend that since, without the devise to Agnes Duncan by the will, she…
Beem v. BeemThere was involved also not merely the title to real estate but the proper distribution of personal property…