finding no implied agreement where carrier paid for two surgeries to cervical spine without any formal agreement that recognized a cervical spine injury, citing the earlier acceptance of a low back injury in the case and the testimony from the adjuster that the payment had been carelessly authorized
Summary of this case from Andreason v. Royal Pest Control230, 2006.
December 11, 2006.
Appeal from Superior CA 05A-03-004.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
finding no implied agreement where carrier paid for two surgeries to cervical spine without any formal agreement that recognized a cervical spine injury, citing the earlier acceptance of a low back injury in the case and the testimony from the adjuster that the payment had been carelessly authorized
Summary of this case from Andreason v. Royal Pest Controlconsidering evidentiary rulings by an administrative board under an abuse of discretion standard
Summary of this case from Imhof v. Del. Bd. of Med. Licensure & DisciplineIn Tenaglia-Evans, the Supreme Court held that, when an insurance adjuster, who carelessly approved every claim, authorized payment for claimant's surgery, such payment was solely a result of the "poor performance" of the insurance adjuster.
Summary of this case from Andreason v. Royal Pest ControlFull title:Tenaglia-Evans v. St. Francis Hosp
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Dec 11, 2006
Starun v. All Am. Eng'g Co., 350 A.2d 765 (Del.1975).Tenaglia–Evans v. St. Francis Hosp., 913 A.2d 570, 2006…
World Airways, Inc. v. Golson1987), overruled on other grounds, Andreason v. Royal Pest Control, 72 A.2d 115 (Del. 2013). Tenaglia-Evans…