From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Templeton Properties LP v. Town of Boone

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jun 11, 2015
368 N.C. 82 (N.C. 2015)

Opinion

No. 234PA14.

2015-06-11

TEMPLETON PROPERTIES LP, Petitioner v. TOWN OF BOONE, Respondent.

Brough Law Firm, by Michael B. Brough ; and di Santi Watson Capua Wilson & Garrett, PLLC, Boone, by Anthony S. di Santi and Chelsea B. Garrett , for petitioner-appellant. Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Charlotte, by Benjamin R. Sullivan , for respondent-appellee.


On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 759 S.E.2d 311 (2014), reversing an order entered on 7 August 2013 by Judge Shannon R. Joseph in Superior Court, Watauga County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 20 April 2015. Brough Law Firm, by Michael B. Brough; and di Santi Watson Capua Wilson & Garrett, PLLC, Boone, by Anthony S. di Santi and Chelsea B. Garrett, for petitioner-appellant. Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Charlotte, by Benjamin R. Sullivan, for respondent-appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Templeton Properties LP v. Town of Boone

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jun 11, 2015
368 N.C. 82 (N.C. 2015)
Case details for

Templeton Properties LP v. Town of Boone

Case Details

Full title:TEMPLETON PROPERTIES LP, Petitioner v. TOWN OF BOONE, Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jun 11, 2015

Citations

368 N.C. 82 (N.C. 2015)
772 S.E.2d 239

Citing Cases

N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lanier Law Grp.

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.…