From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teichmann v. Parrish

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 28, 1946
157 F.2d 75 (D.C. Cir. 1946)

Opinion

No. 9173.

Argued May 30, 1946.

Decided June 28, 1946.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Action for damages for alleged negligent treatment by Virginia J. (Bennet) Parrish against Dr. Walter Teichmann. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Mr. J. Harry Welch, of Washington, D.C. with whom Mr. H. Mason Welch, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Samuel B. Block and John R. Daily, both of Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellant.

Mr. Robert H. McNeill, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.


Appellee has recovered damages for alleged negligent treatment administered to her by or under the direction of appellant as a physician. The evidence was conflicting. The principal question is whether the evidence favorable to appellee, if believed, supports the verdict. We find that it does. Appellant's other assignments of error are also without merit.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Teichmann v. Parrish

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 28, 1946
157 F.2d 75 (D.C. Cir. 1946)
Case details for

Teichmann v. Parrish

Case Details

Full title:TEICHMANN v. PARRISH

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jun 28, 1946

Citations

157 F.2d 75 (D.C. Cir. 1946)

Citing Cases

Furr v. Herzmark

* * *" 35 App.D.C. at page 61. Other cases on the general subject in this jurisdiction are here compiled,…