From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teague v. City of Omaha

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Jun 11, 1982
320 N.W.2d 779 (Neb. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-117.

Filed June 11, 1982.

Appeal from the Nebraska Workmen's Compensation Court. Reversed and dismissed.

Herbert M. Fitle, City Attorney, and George S. Selders, Jr., for appellant.

M. H. Weinberg of Weinberg Weinberg, P.C., for appellee.

Submitted without oral argument. KRIVOSHA, C.J., BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, CLINTON, WHITE, HASTINGS, and CAPORALE, JJ.


The instant appeal from the Nebraska Workmen's Compensation Court involves the issue as to whether payment by the City of Omaha of disability pension benefits under an unenforceable ordinance in lieu of workmen's compensation benefits estops the City from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense. Our opinion in Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha, ante p. 372, 318 N.W.2d 742 (1982), is dispositive of the issue. Such payments did not toll the period of limitations and the City of Omaha is not estopped from asserting the period of limitations as a defense. The award of the Nebraska Workmen's Compensation Court is reversed and the action dismissed.

REVERSED AND DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Teague v. City of Omaha

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Jun 11, 1982
320 N.W.2d 779 (Neb. 1982)
Case details for

Teague v. City of Omaha

Case Details

Full title:TEDDY A. TEAGUE, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF OMAHA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Jun 11, 1982

Citations

320 N.W.2d 779 (Neb. 1982)
320 N.W.2d 779

Citing Cases

Maxey v. Fremont Department of Utilities

This court previously upheld the separate and distinct nature of the Workmen's Compensation Act and other…

Golda v. City of Omaha

This action arises by reason of an order of dismissal entered by a three-judge Workmen's Compensation Court…