From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teachers Ins. Annuity v. Code Beta Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 1994
204 A.D.2d 193 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 19, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.).


The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants' motion to vacate their default in proceeding to trial. Defendants' attorney was aware of complications in his recovery from eye surgery more than a month before trial was set to begin on February 24, 1992, but failed to arrange for substitute counsel as the court had directed on December 16, 1991, the originally scheduled trial date that was adjourned at the request of defendants' attorney because of his then impending eye surgery. Failure to seek substitution of other counsel was not excusable given these circumstances (Chery v. Anthony, 156 A.D.2d 414, 417), which included a written stipulation fixing February 24, 1992 as the final adjourned trial date (Wimpy's Collision Works v. Miceli, 108 A.D.2d 854). While defendants' attorney argued that it was not until the trial date approached that he realized his condition prevented him from proceeding, the affidavit of his own physician indicates that the problem was first discovered in mid-January, 1992, and he should have addressed the problem then by either finding substitute counsel or apprising the court of his predicament. We also agree with the IAS Court that defendants failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense, their attorney's conclusory assertions that plaintiff sellers breached their contract with defendant buyers by failing to maintain the subject hotel during the contract period being without evidentiary value (James v. Hoffman, 158 A.D.2d 398) and devoid of evidentiary facts (Matter of Jones, 128 A.D.2d 403, 404); likewise, the affidavit of defendant Dopp did no more than "affirm" the attorney's claim of a "good and meritorious defense". While a hotel development executive did testify that marketing at the hotel was minimal and occupancy rates declined during the contract period, he did not attribute these conditions to plaintiffs' neglect such as would put them in breach of the contract.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Asch, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Teachers Ins. Annuity v. Code Beta Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 1994
204 A.D.2d 193 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Teachers Ins. Annuity v. Code Beta Group

Case Details

Full title:TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 19, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 193 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 124

Citing Cases

Youni Gems Corp. v. Bassco Creations Inc.

Defendants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default at the inquest. Their prior attorney's…

Murawski v. Manhattan Community Access Corp.

rrant a different result ( cf. Diamond vDiamond Diamonte, 57 AD3d 826, 869 NYS2d 609 [2d Dept 2007]…