T.D.W. v. State

Full title: T.D.W., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Second District

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

No. 2D22-361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2D22-361

11-02-2022

T.D.W., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, JUDGE.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; James R. Stearns, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, JUDGE.

T.D.W., a juvenile, appeals the order finding that he violated his probation. We affirm in all respects except that we remand for the court to correct the violation order.

The record shows that a written violation order was rendered, but it did not specify the conditions that T.D.W. was found to have violated. The State concedes that this was error. "[T]he law is well-settled: if the trial court revokes a juvenile's probation, the court is required to render a written order setting forth the conditions of probation that were violated." Badgers v. State, 267 So.3d 512, 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (alteration in original) (quoting T.M. v. State, 233 So.3d 1275, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)). Accordingly, we affirm but remand for the trial court to enter a written revocation order setting forth the specific conditions of probation that T.D.W. was found to have violated.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.