From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Plastering

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 20, 2016
188 So. 3d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5895.

04-20-2016

Joe TAYLOR, Appellant, v. RODNEY GUNDER PLASTERING AND STUCCO, LLC./MARKEL FIRSTCOMP, Appellees.

Charles H. Leo of Law Offices of Charles H. Leo, P.A., Orlando, and Richard W. Ervin, III, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellees.


Charles H. Leo of Law Offices of Charles H. Leo, P.A., Orlando, and Richard W. Ervin, III, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellees.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981).

ROBERTS, C.J., SWANSON, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Plastering

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 20, 2016
188 So. 3d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Taylor v. Plastering

Case Details

Full title:JOE TAYLOR, Appellant, v. RODNEY GUNDER PLASTERING AND STUCCO, LLC./MARKEL…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 20, 2016

Citations

188 So. 3d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Castellanos v. Next Door Co.

Clearly this issue is affecting numerous claimants. Since Castellanos, the First District has certified that…