From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Hillis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2014
File No: 1:10-CV-94 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 2014)

Opinion

File No: 1:10-CV-94

04-15-2014

MARCUS TAYLOR, #361170, Plaintiff, v. TERILYNN HILLIS, et al., Defendants.


HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL


ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On March 20, 2014, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Defendants' Hillis, Heebsh, and Nogueras's motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 190, 193) be granted, that Defendants' Heebsh and Hillis's Rule 41(b) motion for involuntary dismissal (Dkt. No. 204) be dismissed as moot, and that judgment be entered in Defendants' favor on all of Plaintiff's claims. The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R (Dkt. No. 209) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 190, 193) are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Rule 41(b) motion for involuntary dismissal (Dkt. No. 204) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

__________

ROBERT HOLMES BELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Taylor v. Hillis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2014
File No: 1:10-CV-94 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Taylor v. Hillis

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS TAYLOR, #361170, Plaintiff, v. TERILYNN HILLIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 15, 2014

Citations

File No: 1:10-CV-94 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Spalding v. Eaton Cnty.

Numerous decisions from this Court and other circuits have found deliberate indifference was not established…

Nettles v. Unknown Party

(quoting Johnson v. Doughty, 433 F.3d 1001, 1010 (7th Cir. 2006)); Taylor v. Hillis, No. 1:10-CV-94,…