Opinion
June 11, 1996
Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Edward Kaufmann, J.).
There is no merit to respondent-appellant's claim that his support obligation, as determined under the Child Support Standards Act (Family Ct Act § 413), is unjust, inappropriate, and based upon mathematical errors. In arriving at $1,668.63 a month, the court correctly determined the child's reasonable needs, properly applied the formula set forth in the Child Support Standards Act, properly took into consideration the factors set forth in Family Court Act § 413 (1) (f) with respect to combined parental income over $80,000, and sufficiently articulated the reasons for his decision ( see, Matter of Cassano v. Cassano, 85 N.Y.2d 649; Matter of Prystay v. Avildsen, 220 A.D.2d 337). We have considered appellant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.