From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Artus

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Dec 19, 2007
9:05-CV-0271 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2007)

Opinion

9:05-CV-0271 (LEK/GHL).

December 19, 2007


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on November 5, 2007, by the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 34).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Lowe's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 34) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 32) is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Artus

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Dec 19, 2007
9:05-CV-0271 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Taylor v. Artus

Case Details

Full title:BASHAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. DALE ARTUS, Superintendent, Clinton…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Dec 19, 2007

Citations

9:05-CV-0271 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2007)

Citing Cases

Toliver v. Stefinik

"Generally, it appears from Second Circuit decisions that separate SHU sentences constitute a 'sustained'…

Scott v. Koenigsmann

"Ordinarily, [ ] sworn allegation[s] [ . . . ] are sufficient to constitute evidence for purposes of a motion…