From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor-Fichter Steel Construction Co. v. Niagara Frontier Bridge Commission

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 10, 1941
39 N.E.2d 290 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Argued November 18, 1941

Decided December 10, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, MILLER, J.

M. Carl Levine, David Morgulas and Albert Foreman for appellant.

Barent L. Visscher, George G. Davidson, Jr., E.J. Dimock and Allen R. Henderson for respondent.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Henry Epstein and

John C. Crary, Jr., of counsel, for State of New York, amicus curiae.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

Taylor-Fichter Steel Construction Co. v. Niagara Frontier Bridge Commission

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 10, 1941
39 N.E.2d 290 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

Taylor-Fichter Steel Construction Co. v. Niagara Frontier Bridge Commission

Case Details

Full title:TAYLOR-FICHTER STEEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant, v. NIAGARA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 10, 1941

Citations

39 N.E.2d 290 (N.Y. 1941)
39 N.E.2d 290

Citing Cases

Vanderlinde Elec v. Rochester

The legal impact of the exculpatory clause, therefore, must await the development of facts (Norman Co. v…

Norman Company, Inc. v. County of Nassau

While the defendant County of Nassau and the third-party defendant properly urge the exculpatory clause as a…