Tavake v. Allied Insurance Co.

Full title: SAM TAVAKE and TAMI TAVAKE, Plaintiffs, v. ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY, et…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

2:11-cv-3259 KJM DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2015)

Opinion

SAM TAVAKE and TAMI TAVAKE, Plaintiffs, v. ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-3259 KJM DAD PS United States District Court, E.D. California. September 23, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21.)

         On June 1, 2012, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 37.) Thereafter, several defendants filed motions to dismiss. (Dkt. Nos. 47, 51, 55.) However, on March 21, 2013, this matter was stayed until the automatic stay against defendant City of Stockton was lifted. (Dkt. No. 69.) On May 27, 2015, defendant City of Stockton filed notice that the automatic stay had been lifted. (Dkt. No. 73.)

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

         1. A Status Conference is set for Friday, November 6, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.

         2. All parties are required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf. Any party may appear at the status conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours before the Status Conference; a land line telephone number must be provided.

         3. Plaintiffs shall file and serve status reports on or before October 23, 2015, and defendants shall file and serve status reports on or before October 30, 2015. Each party's status report shall address any relevant events occurring since the stay of this action on March 21, 2013, whether any amendment of pleadings is necessary prior to the court ruling on the pending motions to dismiss, and any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of this action.¹

1 Defendant City of Stockton's status report shall also address how the defendant intends to respond to plaintiffs' first amended complaint.

         4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 and 183.